On 07/19/2017 11:24 AM, Gabriel Craciunescu wrote:
To make it consistent, maybe rename the patch title starting with ath10k:
> From: Gabriel Craciunescu
>
> Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages like:
>
> ...
> ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel co
From: Gabriel Craciunescu
Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages like:
...
ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
ath10k_warn: 155 callbacks suppressed
...
Use ath10k_dbg() here too.
On 19.07.2017 18:26, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 17:37 +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages
like:
...
ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
ath10k_
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 17:37 +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages
> like:
>
> ...
> ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
>
> ath10k_warn: 155 callbacks suppressed
[]
Each time we get disconencted from AP we get flooded with messages like:
...
ath10k_pci :03:00.0: no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!
ath10k_warn: 155 callbacks suppressed
...
Use ath10k_dbg() here too.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel C