From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:24:52 +1100
> On PowerPC allmodconfig build we get this:
>
> net/key/af_key.c:400: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
> range of data type
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thank
On PowerPC allmodconfig build we get this:
net/key/af_key.c:400: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
of data type
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/key/af_key.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This version gets rid of
From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:34:22 +1100
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I think we should retain the check, but modify it so that GCC knows we
> > understand that it's OK if it is always false. Perh
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:08:46 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not so sure ifdef'ing things up all over the place is the way to
> solve this. It makes the code ultra ugly.
I agree.
> I think we should retain the check, but modify it so that GCC knows we
> understand tha
From: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:59:54 +1100
> On PowerPC allmodconfig build we get this:
>
> net/key/af_key.c:400: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
> range of data type
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
>
> +
On PowerPC allmodconfig build we get this:
net/key/af_key.c:400: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
of data type
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/key/af_key.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothw
