On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:42:32 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:35 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > Could we split off the NAPI context part of network_device instead?
> > I'll work up something for 2.6.21.
>
> That would do the trick too... t
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:35 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Could we split off the NAPI context part of network_device instead?
> I'll work up something for 2.6.21.
That would do the trick too... though I prefer not putting my hands in
network_device too much myself :-)
Ben
-
To unsubscribe f
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:27:38 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This adds an init_dummy_netdev() function that gets a network device
> structure (allocation and lifetime entirely under caller's control) and
> initialize the minimum amount of fields so it can be used to sched
This adds an init_dummy_netdev() function that gets a network device
structure (allocation and lifetime entirely under caller's control) and
initialize the minimum amount of fields so it can be used to schedule
NAPI polls without registering a full blown interface. This is to be
used by drivers tha
