Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-12-02 Thread Paul Moore
On Saturday 01 December 2007 7:28:34 am Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:51:48AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > Steve and/or Joy, could we get a verdict on this issue? The lack of a > > netmask in the SPD audit messages is pretty serious so I'd like to see > > this fixed as soon as pos

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-12-01 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:51:48AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > Steve and/or Joy, could we get a verdict on this issue? The lack of a > netmask > in the SPD audit messages is pretty serious so I'd like to see this fixed as > soon as possible. I'll take the resounding silence as an indication o

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-11-30 Thread Joy Latten
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:51 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007 8:45:46 am Paul Moore wrote: > > On Thursday 29 November 2007 5:34:59 am Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:55:12PM +, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SP

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-11-30 Thread Paul Moore
On Thursday 29 November 2007 8:45:46 am Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007 5:34:59 am Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:55:12PM +, Paul Moore wrote: > > > Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SPD entry is not > > > included in any of the SPD related audit

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-11-29 Thread Paul Moore
On Thursday 29 November 2007 5:34:59 am Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:55:12PM +, Paul Moore wrote: > > Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SPD entry is not included > > in any of the SPD related audit messages. This can cause a problem when > > the audit log is exa

Re: [PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:55:12PM +, Paul Moore wrote: > Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SPD entry is not included in > any of the SPD related audit messages. This can cause a problem when the > audit log is examined as the netmask/prefix-length is vital in determining > what

[PATCH] XFRM: SPD auditing fix to include the netmask/prefix-length

2007-11-26 Thread Paul Moore
Currently the netmask/prefix-length of an IPsec SPD entry is not included in any of the SPD related audit messages. This can cause a problem when the audit log is examined as the netmask/prefix-length is vital in determining what network traffic is affected by a particular SPD entry. This patch f