Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2008-01-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: - Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros - added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/Kconfig |2 +- drivers/net/sgiseeq.c | 64 ++

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-19 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:42:36PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > - Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros > - added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-19 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
- Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros - added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/Kconfig |2 +- drivers/net/sgiseeq.c | 64 ++-

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:18:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: Changes to last version: - Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros (suggested by Ralf) - added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier hrm, could you rediff? it doesn't

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-18 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:18:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >Changes to last version: > >- Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros (suggested by Ralf) > >- added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier > > hrm, could you rediff? it doesn't seem to apply su

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use only cached access to memory. Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Changes to last

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-04 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:14:46PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Changes to last version: >> - Use inline functions for dma_sync_* instead of macros (suggested by Ralf) >> - added Kconfig change to make selection for similair SGI boxes easier > > Has Ralf ACK'd this updated version? Acked-by: Ralf

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use only cached access to memory. Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Changes to last

[UPDATED PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-02 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use only cached access to memory. Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Changes to last version: - Use inline functi

Re: [PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: Following patch is clearly 2.6.25 material and is needed to get SGI IP28 machines supported. Thomas. SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use onl

Re: [PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-11-27 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:29:19PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > Following patch is clearly 2.6.25 material and is needed to get SGI IP28 > machines supported. > > Thomas. > > SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional > wait states) when accessing memory uncac

[PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28

2007-11-26 Thread Thomas Bogendoerfer
Following patch is clearly 2.6.25 material and is needed to get SGI IP28 machines supported. Thomas. SGI IP28 machines would need special treatment (enable adding addtional wait states) when accessing memory uncached. To avoid this pain I changed the driver to use only cached access to memory. S