Ian Kumlien schrieb:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 23:38 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>>Ian Kumlien schrieb:
>>
>>>I also saw some oddities... portage stopped working, i dunno if this can
>>>be MSI related or so, else something is trashing memory in a very
>>>special way =P
>>
>>Yes, 0.15 caus
Ian Kumlien wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 09:18 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:38:38 +0100
Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2006 17:00, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
2.6.16-rc5 with disable_msi=1 works for me, no hangs seen so far. I rsynced
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 09:18 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:38:38 +0100
> Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 27 February 2006 17:00, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > 2.6.16-rc5 with disable_msi=1 works for me, no hangs seen so far. I rsynced
> > 80
> >
On Monday 27 February 2006 18:18, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Okay, then what I need is lspci -v of all systems that have the problem,
> I'll make a blacklist (or update PCI quirks). I suspect that MSI doesn't
> work for any devices on these systems, or MSI changes the timing enough to
> expose exis
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:38:38 +0100
Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 27 February 2006 17:00, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:03:45 +0100
> >
> > Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Bisect done:
> > > >
> > > > 4d52b48b43d0d1d5959fa722ee00
On Monday 27 February 2006 17:00, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:03:45 +0100
>
> Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bisect done:
> > >
> > > 4d52b48b43d0d1d5959fa722ee0046e3542e5e1b is first bad commit
> > > [PATCH] sky2: support msi interrupt (revised)
> > >
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:03:45 +0100
Wolfgang Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:31, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> > > on how t
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 23:38 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Ian Kumlien schrieb:
> > I also saw some oddities... portage stopped working, i dunno if this can
> > be MSI related or so, else something is trashing memory in a very
> > special way =P
>
> Yes, 0.15 causes memory corruption even
On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:31, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> > on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm
> > taking the full kerne
Ian Kumlien schrieb:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
>>>
On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>Instead of whin
On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints
> on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm
> taking the full kernel tree and skip testing those bisect steps that didn't
> change sky
On Sunday 26 February 2006 16:00, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the individual
> > patches leading from 0.13a to current head, please give me a series of
> > patches to incrementally app
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > Instead of whining, try this.
> > >
> > > I tr
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Instead of whining, try this.
> >
> > I tried and still see the hang.
>
> I'm at a record 12 hours with that pat
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:03 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Instead of whining, try this.
I'm sorry to say that this failed after 12h 33m =P
--
Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 09:57 +0100, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Instead of whining, try this.
>
> I tried and still see the hang.
I'm at a record 12 hours with that patch.
> Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the
On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Instead of whining, try this.
I tried and still see the hang.
Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the individual
patches leading from 0.13a to current head, please give me a series of
patches to incrementally app
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:03 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Instead of whining, try this.
Applied and compiled, rebooting in a bit =)
--
Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 01:54 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> you may want to push this patch into 2.6.16. The version it reverts to
> has been running stable for over four weeks for various folks (CC'ed)
> and we have had no success communicating with the maintainer.
I don't th
Instead of whining, try this.
--- drivers/net/sky2.c.orig 2006-02-25 18:02:10.0 -0800
+++ drivers/net/sky2.c 2006-02-25 18:03:13.0 -0800
@@ -1895,19 +1895,6 @@
u16 hwidx;
u16 tx_done[2] = { TX_NO_STATUS, TX_NO_STATUS };
- sky2_write32(hw, STAT_CTRL, SC
Hi Jeff,
you may want to push this patch into 2.6.16. The version it reverts to
has been running stable for over four weeks for various folks (CC'ed)
and we have had no success communicating with the maintainer.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
Revert sky2 to 0.13 with a four-line fix on top of it.
Later v
21 matches
Mail list logo
