Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: use allocated/queued reqs for LST bit"

2016-11-01 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, David Miller writes: > From: Ville Syrjälä > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:33:32 +0300 > >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:16:13PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> Yeah, I'm guessing we're gonna need some help from networking folks. The >>> only thing we did since v4.7 was actually respect req->no_in

Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: use allocated/queued reqs for LST bit"

2016-10-31 Thread David Miller
From: Ville Syrjälä Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 19:33:32 +0300 > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:16:13PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Yeah, I'm guessing we're gonna need some help from networking folks. The >> only thing we did since v4.7 was actually respect req->no_interrupt flag >> coming from u_ether

Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: use allocated/queued reqs for LST bit"

2016-10-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:16:13PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Ville Syrjälä writes: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:08:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:36:09AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Felipe Balbi writes: > >> > >>

Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: dwc3: gadget: use allocated/queued reqs for LST bit"

2016-10-28 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, Ville Syrjälä writes: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:08:26PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:36:09AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Felipe Balbi writes: >> >> > Okay, I have found a regression on dwc3 and another patch follows: >> > >> > commi