On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:48:28AM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> As stated in a comment, the ipw2200 driver uses several routines that were
> borrowed from ieee80211_geo.c. As ipw2200 requires ieee80211, these
> routines are duplicated. The attached patch, which is sent as an attachment
> to pres
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
Looks good to me, though I only made a cursory glance to verify that routines
are indeed identical.
-- Pete
The only difference is in the test near the beginning of ieee80211_is_valid_channel where the
IEEE80211_CH_INVALID flag is tested, whereas it was not in the ipw2200
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:48:28 -0600, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As stated in a comment, the ipw2200 driver uses several routines that were
> borrowed
> from ieee80211_geo.c.
> Signed-Off-By: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks good to me, though I only made a cursory glance to
As stated in a comment, the ipw2200 driver uses several routines that were borrowed from
ieee80211_geo.c. As ipw2200 requires ieee80211, these routines are duplicated. The attached patch,
which is sent as an attachment to preserve whitespace, converts ipw2200.c to use the ieee80211
versions, the