Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 20:57 -0500, Valentine Barshak wrote:
+static int m88e_init(struct mii_phy *phy)
+{
+ printk("%s: Marvell 88E Ethernet\n", __FUNCTION__);
+ phy_write(phy, 0x14, 0x0ce3);
+ phy_write(phy, 0x18, 0x4101);
+ phy_wri
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 20:57 -0500, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> +static int m88e_init(struct mii_phy *phy)
> +{
> + printk("%s: Marvell 88E Ethernet\n", __FUNCTION__);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x14, 0x0ce3);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x18, 0x4101);
> + phy_write(phy, 0x09, 0x0e00);
> +
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:13:48 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >>> This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valentine Barshak wrote:
This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW
EMAC driver.
These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
The PHY code is
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> > These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> > The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 07:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I would ideally like a single active patch generator (even if they
> > are
> > merely reviewed others work sometimes).
> >
> > Outside of that, I'm hoping you and the other
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 15:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I would ideally like a single active patch generator (even if they
> are
> merely reviewed others work sometimes).
>
> Outside of that, I'm hoping you and the other people listed making
> changes will self-organize without my help :)
Josh
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:53 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Roland Dreier (2):
>ibm_new_emac: Nuke SET_MODULE_OWNER() use
>ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct
> net_device
>
Wow, I'd have loved to be CCed at least on the last one since I was
about to do just th
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:53:26 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me
patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups
across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple people are activ
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:53:26 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Seems sane to me -- ACK -- but we have multiple people sending me
> >> patches for a single driver. That's normal for janitorial cleanups
> >> across the whole tree, but discouraged when multiple people are actively
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valentine Barshak wrote:
This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stef
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:27:23 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
> > These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
> > The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese
Valentine Barshak wrote:
This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Va
This patch adds BCM5248 and Marvell 88E PHY support to NEW EMAC driver.
These PHY chips are used on PowerPC 440EPx boards.
The PHY code is based on the previous work by Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PRO
14 matches
Mail list logo