From: Krzysztof Halasa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:28:07 +0100
> Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
> >
> > Since the caller and the upper caller doesn
Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
>
> Since the caller and the upper caller doesn't hod the rtnl semaphore.
> We should use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice.
NAK, not-a-b
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:13:44 +0800
> Let's see who else is doing this:
>
> [NET]: Check RTNL status in unregister_netdevice
>
> The caller must hold the RTNL so let's check it in unregister_netdevice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Goo
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:35:56 +0800
>
>> [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
>
> Applied, thanks for finding and fixing this bug.
Let&#x
From: Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:35:56 +0800
> [PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
>
> Since the caller and the upper caller doesn't hod the rtnl semaphore.
> We should use unregister_netdev instead
[PATCH] HDLC driver: use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice
Since the caller and the upper caller doesn't hod the rtnl semaphore.
We should use unregister_netdev instead of unregister_netdevice.
Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
hdlc_fr.c |6 +++-
