On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:00:18PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> "da" is kzalloc()'d, how can da->da_synced not be zero?
Because it was originally kmalloc'd, not kzalloc'd. It was
fixed about 2 days prior to my patch submission, here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120343348811767&w=2
wh
From: Phil Oester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:05:42 -0800
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 908f07c..999af2e 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -2905,6 +2905,7 @@ int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int
> *count,
>
Phil Oester wrote:
In commit 56addd6eeeb4e11f5a0af7093ca078e0f29140e0 the VLAN multicast list
handling was reworked. Unfortunately, a variable initialization was missed,
and multicast over vlan devices has been broken since 2.6.23-rc1 (apparently
not too many people use this). Trivial fix below
In commit 56addd6eeeb4e11f5a0af7093ca078e0f29140e0 the VLAN multicast list
handling was reworked. Unfortunately, a variable initialization was missed,
and multicast over vlan devices has been broken since 2.6.23-rc1 (apparently
not too many people use this). Trivial fix below, which might be a ca