Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
It would be nicer to replace the entire hand-made name
allocation to remove the 100 device limit.
Actually, I thought the same, but fixing % in names looks like a
BUG-fix for 2.6.25, while removing the hand-made name allocation
looks like an en
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
>> receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
>> Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
>> (rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
(rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
character.
Not sure how bad is th
Four tunnel drivers (ip_gre, ipip, ip6_tunnel and sit) can
receive a pre-defined name for a device from the userspace.
Since these drivers call the register_netdevice() after this
(rtnl_lock is held), the device's name may contain a '%'
character.
Not sure how bad is this to have a device with a
