From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:41:02 -0700
> Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
> If you want to tag some "bad apples" thats okay, but would need
> some more infrastructure.
The behavior of the TCP stack is a system wide decision.
If anything it
Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
* Stephen Hemminger | 2006-10-27 07:41:02 [-0700]:
Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
Technical no, in the sense of usability for everybody yes. You are right
Stephen, as a programmer I understand you complete!
But on the other side: We know for
* Stephen Hemminger | 2006-10-27 07:41:02 [-0700]:
>Please no, it makes the socket option useless.
Technical no, in the sense of usability for everybody yes. You are right
Stephen, as a programmer I understand you complete!
But on the other side: We know for sure that this IS a problem if we all
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:43:11 +0200
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * David Miller | 2006-10-26 17:02:21 [-0700]:
>
> >Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
> >useless.
>
> Sorry my mistake! I am en route and I paste the patch into my editor, who eat
* David Miller | 2006-10-26 17:02:21 [-0700]:
>Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
>useless.
Sorry my mistake! I am en route and I paste the patch into my editor, who eat
all tabs. One more time: sorry!
Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to change
conges
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:52:56 +0200
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to change congestion control
> algorithm.
>
> Under normal circumstances a application programmer doesn't have enough
> information to choose the "right" algorithm (exp
On 10/27/06, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Ian McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:59:30 +1300
> I don't agree with this at all. I would love Firefox, BitTorrent etc
> to implement usage of TCP-LP for example so they use "unused"
> bandwidth only.
>
> With th
From: "Ian McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:59:30 +1300
> I don't agree with this at all. I would love Firefox, BitTorrent etc
> to implement usage of TCP-LP for example so they use "unused"
> bandwidth only.
>
> With this change applications can't do this.
>
> If we are g
This is driving me crazy...
Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
useless.
I want to ask why it is so hard for people to submit patches that are
not corrupted? :-/
I type in this kind of email response at least 2 or 3 times every
single day that I review patches.
On 10/27/06, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to change congestion control
algorithm.
Under normal circumstances a application programmer doesn't have enough
information to choose the "right" algorithm (expect he is the pchar/pathchar
main
Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to change congestion control
algorithm.
Under normal circumstances a application programmer doesn't have enough
information to choose the "right" algorithm (expect he is the pchar/pathchar
maintainer). At 99.9% only the local host administrator has the k
11 matches
Mail list logo
