From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:23:23 +0900
> Hi Ingo and all,
>
> This is the third one of MIPv6 module patch. It can be applied
> after two patches which are already sent to the list.
> Could you review it?
>
>
> It is clean-up for XFRM type modules and adds aliases with its
Dear Nakamura-san,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> This is the third one of MIPv6 module patch. It can be applied
> after two patches which are already sent to the list.
> Could you review it?
They look good. Thanks for taking the time to clean this up!
Acked-by: Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Be
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > Could we use the existing IPPROTO_* values for all of these?
>
> No, because they are of enums.
Good point. I've forgotten about these module alias hacks :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 25 May 2007 15:32:20 +1000), Herbert Xu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:23:23PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> > index 1e53520..c9f895f 100644
> > --- a/include/net/xfrm
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:23:23PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> index 1e53520..c9f895f 100644
> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
> @@ -19,9 +19,19 @@
> #include
> #include
>
> +#define XFRM_PROTO_ESP
Hi Ingo and all,
This is the third one of MIPv6 module patch. It can be applied
after two patches which are already sent to the list.
Could you review it?
It is clean-up for XFRM type modules and adds aliases with its
protocol:
ESP, AH, IPCOMP, IPIP and IPv6 for IPsec
ROUTING and DSTOPTS for M
