On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:38:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> As followups it would be nice to:
> 2) Change these 64 and 128 constant sizes to something with
>a name.
Yes, this is not nice and I was already working on it.
I decided to send this patch soon as I didn't want to hold Christoph's
Hi Dave,
As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig, dev_alloc_skb() is not intended to be
used for allocating TX sk_buff. The IrDA stack was exclusively calling
dev_alloc_skb() on the TX path, and this patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/irda/af_irda.c
From: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:13:31 +0300
> As pointed out by Christoph Hellwig, dev_alloc_skb() is not intended to be
> used for allocating TX sk_buff. The IrDA stack was exclusively calling
> dev_alloc_skb() on the TX path, and this patch fixes that.
>
> Signe
