On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:38:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:11:11 +0900
>
> > I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
> > the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
> > Or in other words, two
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:11:11 +0900
> I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
> the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
> Or in other words, two fairly gratuitous goto are removed.
>
> On a related note, I wonder if t
I guess that this code used to be more complex, but replacing
the goto with a while seems to make things a bit more readable.
Or in other words, two fairly gratuitous goto are removed.
On a related note, I wonder if there should be a limit to how
many times it tries.
Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman <
