Re: [PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0

2007-12-26 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
Hi Jamal, jamal wrote: > Pablo, below looks an oversight. > I think there are some libraries like the mark target need also to be > backward compatible. Shouldn't "mark" be in capital letters? >> lilsol:~# export IPTABLES_LIB_DIR=/root/iptables-1.4.0/extensions/ >> lilsol:~# tc actions add actio

Re: [PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0

2007-12-24 Thread jamal
I just submitted a tested, slightly reduced patch (example we dont need to register matches) and it works as expected now. Thanks for the excellent work Denys. Pablo, below looks an oversight. I think there are some libraries like the mark target need also to be backward compatible. cheers, jama

Re: [PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0

2007-12-24 Thread jamal
On Mon, 2007-24-12 at 18:07 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > Hi, probably like this will be better? > Previous patch was not backward compatible. > > Btw i checked twice, name is changed from libipt_MARK to libxt_MARK. So > probably when you have tested this, your iproute2 was looking to old >

[PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0

2007-12-24 Thread Denys Fedoryshchenko
Hi, probably like this will be better? Previous patch was not backward compatible. Btw i checked twice, name is changed from libipt_MARK to libxt_MARK. So probably when you have tested this, your iproute2 was looking to old libipt_MARK (iptables is not deleting old libraries on make install). ---