From: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:25:12 +0100
> Now suppose somebody needs to change locking. He'll have to convert
> it back. IMHO a conditional return is worse than "goto clearly_named_label"
I totally agree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 09:01:10 schrieb Andi Kleen:
>>
>> gcc does not generate different code for return foo vs bar = foo; goto x;
>> x: return bar; So convert it all to direct returns for better readability.
>
> Now suppose somebody needs to cha
Am Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 09:01:10 schrieb Andi Kleen:
>
> gcc does not generate different code for return foo vs bar = foo; goto x;
> x: return bar; So convert it all to direct returns for better readability.
Now suppose somebody needs to change locking. He'll have to convert
it back. IMHO a
gcc does not generate different code for return foo vs bar = foo; goto x;
x: return bar; So convert it all to direct returns for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
===
