From: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:43:44 -0500
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > This counter is currently write-only.
> >
> > Drawing an analogy with the similar tcp counter, I think
> > that this one should be pointed by the sockets_allocated
> > members of sctp_prot a
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
This counter is currently write-only.
Drawing an analogy with the similar tcp counter, I think
that this one should be pointed by the sockets_allocated
members of sctp_prot and sctpv6_prot.
Or should it be instead removed at all?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PR
This counter is currently write-only.
Drawing an analogy with the similar tcp counter, I think
that this one should be pointed by the sockets_allocated
members of sctp_prot and sctpv6_prot.
Or should it be instead removed at all?
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --gi