Re: [PATCH][RFC] net/ipv6: seperate sit driver to extra module

2006-10-05 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:49:38 -0400 (EDT)), James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > Is there a reason why the tunnel driver for IPv6-in-IPv4 is currently > > compiled into the ipv6 module? This driver is only needed in

Re: [PATCH][RFC] net/ipv6: seperate sit driver to extra module

2006-10-05 Thread James Morris
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Is there a reason why the tunnel driver for IPv6-in-IPv4 is currently > compiled into the ipv6 module? This driver is only needed in gateways > between different IPv6 networks. On all other hosts with ipv6 enabled it > is not required. To have this driver

Re: [PATCH][RFC] net/ipv6: seperate sit driver to extra module

2006-10-05 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:49:38AM -0400, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > Is there a reason why the tunnel driver for IPv6-in-IPv4 is currently > > compiled into the ipv6 module? This driver is only needed in gateways > > between different IPv6 networks. On all

[PATCH][RFC] net/ipv6: seperate sit driver to extra module

2006-10-05 Thread Joerg Roedel
Is there a reason why the tunnel driver for IPv6-in-IPv4 is currently compiled into the ipv6 module? This driver is only needed in gateways between different IPv6 networks. On all other hosts with ipv6 enabled it is not required. To have this driver in a seperate module will save memory on those ma