James Morris wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, James Morris wrote:
Once again, these #ifdefs need to disappear from the core code.
Sorry, I was looking at the wrong email.
Please send patches inline.
This would have helped :-)
OK. I never mind.
But I have already replied for your previous
Sure, I'm considering your comment.
And I did not resend any glue patch to the IPsec stack.
Did I mistake to send it?
I did not intend to reuse my old glue codes.
I'm going to prepare it reflect your comment.
I sent only XCBC core.
James Morris wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Kazunori Miyazawa wr
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, James Morris wrote:
> Once again, these #ifdefs need to disappear from the core code.
Sorry, I was looking at the wrong email.
> Please send patches inline.
This would have helped :-)
- James
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Kazunori Miyazawa wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_XCBC
+ mode = aalg_desc->desc.sadb_alg_id == SADB_X_AALG_AES_XCBC_MAC ?
+ CRYPTO_TFM_MODE_CBC : 0;
+#endif
+
ahp->key = x->aalg->alg_key;
ahp->key_len = (x->aalg->alg_key_len+7)/8;
- ahp->
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Kazunori Miyazawa wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_XCBC
+ mode = aalg_desc->desc.sadb_alg_id == SADB_X_AALG_AES_XCBC_MAC ?
+ CRYPTO_TFM_MODE_CBC : 0;
+#endif
+
ahp->key = x->aalg->alg_key;
ahp->key_len = (x->aalg->alg_key_len+7)/8;
- ahp-
Hi,
This patch is a glue for using AES-XCBC-MAC from IPsec.
This depends on the previous patch.
I have already checked the patch with TAHI test.
I should have put sequence number on my patches, sorry.
Signed-off-by: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Kazunori Miyazawa
diff --git a/in
