From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:23:48 +0900
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >> From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:35:37 +0900
> >>
>
David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:35:37 +0900
BTW, I have a question about descrementing the reference count of
rt->peer. The reference cound in normal "d
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:35:37 +0900
>
> > BTW, I have a question about descrementing the reference count of
> > rt->peer. The reference cound in normal "dst" struct
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:37:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:35:37 +0900
>
> > Sorry, I mixed up changes in the patches. I described that [4/7] will add
> > "IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec tunnel". However I send
From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:35:37 +0900
> Sorry, I mixed up changes in the patches. I described that [4/7] will add
> "IPv6 over IPv4 IPsec tunnel". However I send a patch for "IPv4 over IPv6"
> as a reply because it includes the discussing item.
> So this
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:41:39 +0900
Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:38:39 +0900
> >
> > What is going on here?
> >
> >> + /* Without this, the atomic inc below segfaul
David Miller wrote:
From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:38:39 +0900
What is going on here?
+ /* Without this, the atomic inc below segfaults */
+ if (encap_family == AF_INET6) {
+ rt->pe
From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:38:39 +0900
What is going on here?
> + /* Without this, the atomic inc below segfaults */
> + if (encap_family == AF_INET6) {
> + rt->peer = NULL;
> +
