From: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:03:24 +0900
> I send patches to fix conflict of device tunnels with the inter
> address family ipsec tunnel. Yoshifuji-san and Kozakai-san
> noticed me of the confliction.
>
> I adopt same approach of tunnel4.c and tunnel6.c. I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:03:24 +0900), Kazunori
MIYAZAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> We need this to use ipcomp with inter address family tunnel.
>
> [1/6] extending xfrm4_tunnel utility to support inter address family for "sit"
> [2/6] extending xfrm6_tunnel utility
Hello David and Herbert,
Thank you for applying our patches with the fix.
I send patches to fix conflict of device tunnels with the inter
address family ipsec tunnel. Yoshifuji-san and Kozakai-san
noticed me of the confliction.
I adopt same approach of tunnel4.c and tunnel6.c. I extend them
to s
