From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:14:54 -0600
> I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
> places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
> AH and ESP, whichever one gets added first, deletes the larval SA.
> It seems AH alwa
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 19:54 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:20 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:14:54 -0600
> >
> > > I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
> > > places without checkin
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:20 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:14:54 -0600
>
> > I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
> > places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
> > AH and ESP, whichev
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:20 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:14:54 -0600
>
> > I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
> > places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
> > AH and ESP, whichev
From: Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:14:54 -0600
> I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
> places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
> AH and ESP, whichever one gets added first, deletes the larval SA.
> It seems AH alwa
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:40 -0500, James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> > > I saw something similar to this some time ago when testing various
> > > failure modes, and discused it with Herbert.
> > >
> > > IIRC, there's a larval SA which is not torn down properly by Raco
