Laurent Chavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 6/1/07, Jay Vosburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> Prior to the change in question, the carrier state of the master
>> device was always on, regardless of the state of the slaves (so even if
>> things didn't work, bonding would claim to b
On 6/1/07, Jay Vosburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Laurent Chavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 5/31/07, Laurent Chavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> if a host configured with 802.3ad bond mode is connected to a switch
>> that does not support 802.3ad, then an aggregator is selected as the
>>
Laurent Chavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 5/31/07, Laurent Chavey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> if a host configured with 802.3ad bond mode is connected to a switch
>> that does not support 802.3ad, then an aggregator is selected as the
>> active aggregator (first link that has carrier in the
%diff -ru linux-2.6.21.3/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
linux-2.6.21.3.new/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
--- linux-2.6.21.3/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-05-24
14:22:47.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.21.3.new/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c 2007-06-01
09:28:07.0 -0700
@@ -2312
