On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Simon Horman
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:53:39PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Simon Horman
>> wrote:
>> > If an skb was not MPLS initially then it may be GSO and in that case if it
>> > became MPLS then GSO can't be perfo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:53:39PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > If an skb was not MPLS initially then it may be GSO and in that case if it
> > became MPLS then GSO can't be performed because both MPLS and tunnels make
> > use of the inner_
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Simon Horman
wrote:
> If an skb was not MPLS initially then it may be GSO and in that case if it
> became MPLS then GSO can't be performed because both MPLS and tunnels make
> use of the inner_protocol field of struct skbuff in order to allow GSO to
> be performed
If an skb was not MPLS initially then it may be GSO and in that case if it
became MPLS then GSO can't be performed because both MPLS and tunnels make
use of the inner_protocol field of struct skbuff in order to allow GSO to
be performed in the inner packet.
On the other hand if an skb was MPLS ini
