Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> To avoid any misunderstandings:
>
> This wasn't in any way meant against you personally.
>
> And in this case you were right, it was the same bug.
>
> My answer was based on experiences like one during 2.6.19-rc where we
> had 4 bug reports for a regression with a patch
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 04:45:21PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:23:42PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> >> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
> Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the fo
Aaron Sethman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
>>>
>>> Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note
>>> that
>>> this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
>>
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
let me know.
Is this issue still present i
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:23:42PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:23:42PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
> >> Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
> >> this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
>> Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
>> this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
>> let me know.
>
> Is this issue still present in 2.6.10-rc
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
>
> Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
> this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
> let me know.
Is this issue still present in 2.6.10-rc2-git1?
If yes, was 2.6.
