From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:11:17 +0100
> All but one struct dst_ops static initializations miss explicit
> initialization of entries field.
>
> As this field is atomic_t, we should use ATOMIC_INIT(0), and not
> rely on atomic_t implementation.
>
> Signed-off
All but one struct dst_ops static initializations miss explicit
initialization of entries field.
As this field is atomic_t, we should use ATOMIC_INIT(0), and not
rely on atomic_t implementation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
net/ipv4/route.c|2 ++
net/ipv4/xfrm4_po
