On Sun, 2005-24-07 at 20:16 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:11:22 -0400
>
> > ->cb could be used or made to grow dynamically ?
>
> Yes, and back to the whole SKB extensions idea and how tricky
> that is to get right and effici
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:11:22 -0400
> ->cb could be used or made to grow dynamically ?
Yes, and back to the whole SKB extensions idea and how tricky
that is to get right and efficient at the same time.
It is also a good time to remember what I said ab
On Sun, 2005-24-07 at 19:07 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:31:18 +0200
>
> > Anyways, tc_verd needs a serious cleanup, not just for the
> > macros which we might want to replace with bitfields or
> > at least have generic macros to
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:03:08 +0200
> [NET]: Reduce tc_index/tc_verd to u16
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied, thanks Patrick.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev&qu
On Mon, 2005-25-07 at 03:31 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Anyways, tc_verd needs a serious cleanup, not just for the
> macros which we might want to replace with bitfields or
> at least have generic macros to generate the masks.
Right - and as we discussed:
-> recall that the use of bit operations
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:31:18 +0200
> Anyways, tc_verd needs a serious cleanup, not just for the
> macros which we might want to replace with bitfields or
> at least have generic macros to generate the masks. I'll
> look into this once I'm back.
I think tc_
* Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-23 18:23
> Hold on, I'm working on a patch to introduce TC_CB() so we can
> move some of the fields of tc_verd into the control buffer so
> I can do the cleanup at the same time.
I tried but none of the bits can be moved into cb as-is except
for TC_MUNGED
* Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-23 17:58
> Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> >Did you check if there was no side effect with the macros that
> >manipulate tc_verdict?
>
> Of course, these macros are basically the only user. They could use
> some cleanup btw, I think I'll do that later.
Hold
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
Did you check if there was no side effect with the macros that
manipulate tc_verdict?
Of course, these macros are basically the only user. They could use
some cleanup btw, I think I'll do that later.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
Did you check if there was no side effect with the macros that
manipulate tc_verdict?
cheers,
jamal
On Sat, 2005-23-07 at 07:03 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> plain text document attachment (x)
> [NET]: Reduce tc_index/tc_verd to u16
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[
[NET]: Reduce tc_index/tc_verd to u16
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit 97d4e0b5dc8578e9839dae473c61c82760a15a29
tree 47f9c319d51825b4afba489bbf9edf50ae72ed5e
parent 5bfc21c2a7b496ae6e4ca9efe9f69f9a14770ff5
author Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat,
11 matches
Mail list logo
