On Tuesday, August 28 2007 12:45:50 pm Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> > problem then how about the patch below?
>
> I don't think it is.
>
> > -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIP
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
> -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, L
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 00:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +P: Paul Moore
> +M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> +S: Maintained
> +
Aren't there now 2 subsystems in MAINTAINERS for the same thing?