On 6/13/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Does this makes any difference anyway? Both are same eventually?
> What is the rational behind this? Can you please help me
> understanding this?
since this is one of the TO DO items i added to the list of things at
the wiki:
ht
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, psr wrote:
> On 6/13/07, Shani Moideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Replacing alloc_pages(gfp,0) with alloc_page(gfp)
> > in net/core/pktgen.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shani Moideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
> >
On 6/13/07, Shani Moideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Replacing alloc_pages(gfp,0) with alloc_page(gfp)
in net/core/pktgen.c
Signed-off-by: Shani Moideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
index b92a322..2600c7f 100644
--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/c
Replacing alloc_pages(gfp,0) with alloc_page(gfp)
in net/core/pktgen.c
Signed-off-by: Shani Moideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c
index b92a322..2600c7f 100644
--- a/net/core/pktgen.c
+++ b/net/core/pktgen.c
@@ -2414,7 +2414,7 @@ static struct sk_bu
