Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-19 Thread David S. Miller
From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:25:12 +0100 (CET) > Yes, it works now perfectly: Wonderful, it's in Linus's 2.6.15 tree and submitted for 2.6.14-stable. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-19 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, David S. Miller wrote: From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:37:14 +0100 (CET) OK. With this patch kernel switches to new SA immediately, but only for ping. TCP (ssh) session between Cisco and Linux is still protected by the old SA. Ok,

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-19 Thread David S. Miller
From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:37:14 +0100 (CET) > OK. With this patch kernel switches to new SA immediately, but only for > ping. TCP (ssh) session between Cisco and Linux is still protected by the > old SA. Ok, we're making progress :-) When the bundles

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-19 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, David S. Miller wrote: From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:20:19 -0800 (PST) From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:49:50 +0100 (CET) At 17:31:26 kernel executed the one from xfrm_state_add() (Ole #2) but

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-18 Thread David S. Miller
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:20:19 -0800 (PST) > From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:49:50 +0100 (CET) > > > At 17:31:26 kernel executed the one from xfrm_state_add() (Ole #2) but it > > didn't help. :( > > Thanks for

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-18 Thread David S. Miller
From: Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:49:50 +0100 (CET) > At 17:31:26 kernel executed the one from xfrm_state_add() (Ole #2) but it > didn't help. :( Thanks for testing, I'll try to figure out what might be going on. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Re: SA switchover

2005-12-18 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David S. Miller wrote: From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:52:54 -0800 (PST) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index 7cf48aa..25dd8f4 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c Sorry, that p