Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-12-03 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 12/2/2016 7:02 PM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > Hello Sasha, > > Were you able to reproduce this issue? > > Do you have a patch fixing the close function inconsistencies that you > mentioned which I could try out? > > Thanks, > Tyler > > On 11/21/2016 1:40 PM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >> On 11/17/2016

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-12-02 Thread Baicar, Tyler
Hello Sasha, Were you able to reproduce this issue? Do you have a patch fixing the close function inconsistencies that you mentioned which I could try out? Thanks, Tyler On 11/21/2016 1:40 PM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: On 11/17/2016 6:31 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin,

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-21 Thread Baicar, Tyler
On 11/17/2016 6:31 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: Hello Sasha, On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of th

Fwd:[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-17 Thread Neftin, Sasha
] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN On 11/13/2016 2:25 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: > On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: >> On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >>> Hello Sasha, >>> >>> On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrot

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-17 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: > On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >> Hello Sasha, >> >> On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: >>> On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of the __E1000_DOWN bit. Curren

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-15 Thread Baicar, Tyler
On 11/13/2016 2:25 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: Hello Sasha, On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of th

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-13 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 11/13/2016 10:34 AM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: > On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >> Hello Sasha, >> >> On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: >>> On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of the __E1000_DOWN bit. Curren

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-13 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 11/11/2016 12:35 AM, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > Hello Sasha, > > On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: >> On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: >>> Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of the >>> __E1000_DOWN bit. Currently the e1000e driver only releases its IRQ >>> if t

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-10 Thread Baicar, Tyler
Hello Sasha, On 11/9/2016 11:19 PM, Neftin, Sasha wrote: On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of the __E1000_DOWN bit. Currently the e1000e driver only releases its IRQ if the __E1000_DOWN bit is cleared. This is not sufficient because

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: free IRQ regardless of __E1000_DOWN

2016-11-09 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 11/9/2016 11:41 PM, Tyler Baicar wrote: > Move IRQ free code so that it will happen regardless of the > __E1000_DOWN bit. Currently the e1000e driver only releases its IRQ > if the __E1000_DOWN bit is cleared. This is not sufficient because > it is possible for __E1000_DOWN to be set without rel