On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 13:04 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> One last update on this, 4.20.8 compiled with the same compiler works
> - I still suspect that it was fixed by:
> net/mlx5e: Force CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for short ethernet frames
>
> Anyway, we can forget about it now ;)
cool, nice to know.
One last update on this, 4.20.8 compiled with the same compiler works
- I still suspect that it was fixed by:
net/mlx5e: Force CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for short ethernet frames
Anyway, we can forget about it now ;)
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:54 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:29 PM
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:29 PM Ian Kumlien wrote
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed
> > > > wrote:
> >
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien
> > > > wrote
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:41:28PM +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:38 PM Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking
> > > things
> >
> > It doesn't break anything, packet
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I don't know why
> > > =/
> >
> > weird, Maybe a real check-summing
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I don't know why =/
>
> weird, Maybe a real check-summing issue/corruption on the PCI ?!
Actually, it seems to have been introduce
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:49 PM Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:41 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:38 PM Cong Wang
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien
> > > > wrote
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:49 PM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:41 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:38 PM Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > > Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:41 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:38 PM Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > > Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking
> > > things
> >
> > It doesn't break anything, packets are _n
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:38 PM Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking things
>
> It doesn't break anything, packets are _not_ dropped, only that the
> warning itself is noisy.
Not my experien
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ian Kumlien wrote:
>
> Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking things
It doesn't break anything, packets are _not_ dropped, only that the
warning itself is noisy.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:22 PM David Miller wrote:
>
> From: Ian Kumlien
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:12:53 +0100
>
> > Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking things
>
> Its... there:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=
From: Ian Kumlien
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:12:53 +0100
> Could we please schedule this for 4.19 and 4.20 - it's kinda breaking things
Its... there:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?series=&submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:03 PM David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:18:55 +
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 17:16 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm hitting an issue that i think is fixed by the following patch,
> >> i haven't verified it yet - but i
From: Saeed Mahameed
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:18:55 +
> On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 17:16 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm hitting an issue that i think is fixed by the following patch,
>> i haven't verified it yet - but it looks like it should go on the
>> stable queue(?)
>>
>> (And ye
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 17:16 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting an issue that i think is fixed by the following patch,
> i haven't verified it yet - but it looks like it should go on the
> stable queue(?)
>
> (And yes, I did look, and couldn't find it ;))
>
Yes, i couldn't find it n
Hi,
I'm hitting an issue that i think is fixed by the following patch,
i haven't verified it yet - but it looks like it should go on the
stable queue(?)
(And yes, I did look, and couldn't find it ;))
commit e8c8b53ccaff568fef4c13a6ccaf08bf241aa01a
Author: Cong Wang
Date: Mon Dec 3 22:14:04 20
19 matches
Mail list logo
