In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:03:22 +0200), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Yes, thats better. I also thing we shouldn't return -EINVAL but
> -ENOSPC or something like that, -EINVAL usually indicated that
> the user sent an invalid message, which isn't the cas
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:56:46 +0200), Patrick
McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
Okay, thanks.
I think it is better to eliminate these magic numbers.
How about this?
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/ne
[IPV6]: Fix RTNLGRP_IPV6_IFINFO netlink notifications
The allocated skb is too small for the message, which results in an EINVAL
getting reported to the (innocent) multicast listeners.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit f71bc8ace692302ad3a80d84b8cbccbb14e88fe
