Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

2007-01-30 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Hi, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have a driver for PC300/RSV (dual V.35 + V.24) for years. I'm told >> it works with X.21 version too. If someone has a spare T1/E1 card >> (non-returnable donation only) I can try to add support as well. >> T1/E1 is too complicated to maintain with

Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

2006-12-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or "users don't care", which are two very different things... I have a driver for PC300/RSV (dual

Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

2006-11-14 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. > > But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or > "users don't care", which are two very different things... I have a driver for PC300/RSV (dual V.35 + V.24) for yea

[Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

2006-11-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or "users don't care", which are two very different things... Jeff --- Begin Message --- Jeff, As PC300 is not being produced anymore, we decided that

Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found]

2006-11-14 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On 11/14/06, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or "users don't care", which are two very different things... Well, I'm not a user of such card, but I know the