Re: [EXT] [PATCH] aquantia: Remove the build_skb path

2020-11-24 Thread Igor Russkikh
On 23/11/2020 7:20 am, Ramsay, Lincoln wrote: >> Yep, that could be the only way to fix this for now. >> Have you tried to estimate any performance drops from this? > > Unfortunately, I am not in a very good position to do this. The 10G > interfaces on our device don't actually have enough raw

Re: [EXT] [PATCH] aquantia: Remove the build_skb path

2020-11-22 Thread Ramsay, Lincoln
> Yep, that could be the only way to fix this for now. > Have you tried to estimate any performance drops from this? Unfortunately, I am not in a very good position to do this. The 10G interfaces on our device don't actually have enough raw PCI bandwidth available to hit 10G transfer rates. I d

Re: [EXT] [PATCH] aquantia: Remove the build_skb path

2020-11-19 Thread Igor Russkikh
On 20/11/2020 1:01 am, Ramsay, Lincoln wrote: > External Email > > -- > The build_skb path fails to allow for an SKB header, but the hardware > buffer it is built around won't allow for this anyway. > > Just always use the slo