Re: [DOC]: xfrm sync

2006-02-20 Thread jamal
On Sun, 2006-19-02 at 21:04 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:43:33 -0500 > > > Something i wrote around the time of coding the sync stuff. > > Just so i dont loose it - here it is attached ;-> > > Why don't we put this under Documentation

Re: [DOC]: xfrm sync

2006-02-19 Thread David S. Miller
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:43:33 -0500 > Something i wrote around the time of coding the sync stuff. > Just so i dont loose it - here it is attached ;-> Why don't we put this under Documentation/networking/ as "xfrm_sync.txt"? If you agree, please give me a Signed-

[DOC]: xfrm sync

2006-02-19 Thread jamal
Something i wrote around the time of coding the sync stuff. Just so i dont loose it - here it is attached ;-> cheers, jamal The sync patches work is based on initial patches from Krisztian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others. The end goal is to be able to insert attributes + generate events so tha