On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 00:07 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Think about the actual kernel tree source code, not just the
> > metadata...
>
> Disk is cheap. Waiting for the whole damn thing to rebuild after
> switching branches and back agai
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Think about the actual kernel tree source code, not just the
> metadata...
Disk is cheap. Waiting for the whole damn thing to rebuild after
switching branches and back again is less so.
Besides, checking it out is optional.
--
dwmw2
-
To
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:01 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
It makes diffing between lines of development more difficult, takes up
more overall space, less cache friendly, ...
All of which is much less true if you're sharing object directories or
even using alternates.
Thin
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:01 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> It makes diffing between lines of development more difficult, takes up
> more overall space, less cache friendly, ...
All of which is much less true if you're sharing object directories or
even using alternates.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:14 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Some googling seems to show that "git pull" has a bug/feature of
ignoring the branch that one is working in, and pulling "master"
no matter what. I have no clue why; this seems broken to me.
Branches are generally
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:14 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Some googling seems to show that "git pull" has a bug/feature of
> ignoring the branch that one is working in, and pulling "master"
> no matter what. I have no clue why; this seems broken to me.
Branches are generally a PITA -- it's probab
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 21:01 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I wish there was a git option to "just make my shit look like the
> > remote, dammit!" The above is the "easiest" way I know how to do that.
>
> git-fetch -f remote:local ?
There's always "git reset --hard "
cheers
--
Michael El
On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> I wish there was a git option to "just make my shit look like the
> >> remote, dammit!" The above is the "easiest" way I know how to do that.
> >
> > git-fetch -f remote:local ?
>
> If that works... great :) Much bet
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
I wish there was a git option to "just make my shit look like the
remote, dammit!" The above is the "easiest" way I know how to do that.
git-fetch -f remote:local ?
If that works... great :) Much better than what I described.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from
I wish there was a git option to "just make my shit look like the
remote, dammit!" The above is the "easiest" way I know how to do that.
git-fetch -f remote:local ?
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More m
10 matches
Mail list logo
