David S. Miller wrote:
> I haven't found a way to solve the -EFAULT problem, but we should
> fix the ENFILE/EMFILE issue since we can, this has sat on the
> backburner long enough :-)
This seems to be enough.
Is there any valid reason for an application to expect not loosing any
connection
afte
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:51:19 -0800 (PST)
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:51:55 -0800
>
> > Detail of issue is old:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00573.html
> >
> > Once accept fails o
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:51:55 -0800
> Detail of issue is old:
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00573.html
>
> Once accept fails on EMFILE/ENFILE you cannot get the socket even if you free
> up
> fd's and retry...
I want to apply som
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:16:52 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug 5672] New: cannot get socket once accept(2) has failed due to
EMFILE/ENFILE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5672
Summary: cannot get socket once
