From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:29:47 -0800
> Can we make any assumptions about the size and position of fragments.
> For instance, will the first N data bytes of a UDP packet all be in
> the same fragment?
Nope, they can be fragmented any way possible.
For packe
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:41:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:39:22 -0800 (PST)
>
> > From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:23:58 -0800
> >
> > > What is "packet split" in this context?
> >
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:39:22 -0800 (PST)
> From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:23:58 -0800
>
> > What is "packet split" in this context?
>
> It's a mode of buffering used by the e1000 driver.
BTW, the issue is that in
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:23:58 -0800
> What is "packet split" in this context?
It's a mode of buffering used by the e1000 driver.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:15:38PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> When using packet split, netpoll times out when doing a netdump.
What is "packet split" in this context? You ought to cc: the netdump
people as well, as it's not part of the mainline kernel.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia o
When using packet split, netpoll times out when doing a netdump.
Server logs:
--netdump[14973]: Got too many timeouts in handshaking, ignoring
client 172.0.2.250
--netdump[14973]: Got too many timeouts waiting for SHOW_STATUS for
client 172.0.2.250, rebooting it.
When packet split is not used, ne
