On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:35 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:42:23AM +0300, Andrei Popa wrote:
> > ethtool reports the same
>
> Is udev running and having fun renumbering interfaces as they are being
> detected in order to keep "consistent" interface names?
yes, it's ud
On 2007.03.30 10:42:23 +0300, Andrei Popa wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:21 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> with kernel 2.6.20.4(and build in e1000 driver):
> zeus ~ # uname -a
> Linux zeus 2.6.20.4-zeus3 #3 SMP Wed Mar 28 13:44:50 EEST 2007 x86_64
> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz GenuineIntel G
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:42:23AM +0300, Andrei Popa wrote:
> ethtool reports the same
Is udev running and having fun renumbering interfaces as they are being
detected in order to keep "consistent" interface names?
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netde
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:21 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> added netdev.
>
> On 3/29/07, Andrei Popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a dual core 2 server with an intel motherboard and 5 network
> > cards(two onboard) and 1 pci express card with two slots and one pci-x
> > pci64 card the kernel
added netdev.
On 3/29/07, Andrei Popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a dual core 2 server with an intel motherboard and 5 network
cards(two onboard) and 1 pci express card with two slots and one pci-x
pci64 card the kernel sees all of them in dmesg but in mii-tool are
misnumbered and one card is
