Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
> >>It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
> >The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
> >free
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch?
I just f
