Re: [BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-22 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:36 PM Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:49:34PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > > > On 03/08/2019 04:29 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 PM Eric Dumazet > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP

Re: [BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-21 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:49:34PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 03/08/2019 04:29 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 PM Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> > >> Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP enabled kernel (latest David Miller net > >> tree) > >> > >> I got the followin

Re: [BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-20 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 03/08/2019 04:29 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 PM Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP enabled kernel (latest David Miller net tree) >> >> I got the following splat. >> >> It is not immediately obvious to me. Any idea ? > > I think I saw s

Re: [BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-08 Thread Eric Dumazet
On 03/08/2019 04:29 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 PM Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP enabled kernel (latest David Miller net tree) >> >> I got the following splat. >> >> It is not immediately obvious to me. Any idea ? > > I think I saw s

Re: [BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-08 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 PM Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP enabled kernel (latest David Miller net tree) > > I got the following splat. > > It is not immediately obvious to me. Any idea ? I think I saw something similar running test_maps, but I had other changes in th

[BUG] BPF splat on latest kernels

2019-03-08 Thread Eric Dumazet
Running test_progs on a LOCKDEP enabled kernel (latest David Miller net tree) I got the following splat. It is not immediately obvious to me. Any idea ? [ 4169.908826] == [ 4169.914996] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 4