Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v4 00/19] batman-adv: netlink restructuring, part 2

2019-02-07 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Wednesday, 6 February 2019 20:08:14 CET Linus Lüssing wrote: > Ok, will rewrite the batctl part later then. And probably keep "batctl > mm" as a (hidden?) option for compatibility reasons? Yes, sounds good. Kind regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messa

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v4 00/19] batman-adv: netlink restructuring, part 2

2019-02-06 Thread Linus Lüssing
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:20:25PM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote: > [...] > > Another thought, if all this is too vague for now... > > Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D > > > what about > > ommiting the BATADV_ATTR

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v4 00/19] batman-adv: netlink restructuring, part 2

2019-02-06 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote: [...] > Another thought, if all this is too vague for now... Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D > what about > ommiting the BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_(MODE)_ENABLED for now and use > a reverse logic instead? Like > BATA

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v4 00/19] batman-adv: netlink restructuring, part 2

2019-02-05 Thread Linus Lüssing
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Saturday, 19 January 2019 16.56.07 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote: > [...] > > There were also two topics which were not yet really discussed and thus > > these requests (from Linus) were not yet implemented: > > @Jiri, @Linus maybe yo

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v4 00/19] batman-adv: netlink restructuring, part 2

2019-02-05 Thread Simon Wunderlich
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 11:47:20 AM CET Sven Eckelmann wrote: > Aggregated OGM is currently defined as: > > > * according to batctl manpage: > > aggregation|ag [0|1] >If no parameter is given the current aggregation setting >is displayed. Otherwise the parameter