On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:44:37PM +0200, bert hubert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:51:51PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > Benchmark uses 128 bytes sending/receiving per syscall (no latency
> > checks, only throughput.
> > Receiving CPU usage is 3 times less (90% so
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:51:51PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Benchmark uses 128 bytes sending/receiving per syscall (no latency
> checks, only throughput.
> Receiving CPU usage is 3 times less (90% socket code vs. 30%
> Sending CPU usage is 5 times less (upto 50% vs. upto 10%).
Wow. I curr
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:53:05PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Netchannel [1] is pure bridge between low-level hardware and user, without any
> special protocol processing involved between them.
> Users are not limited to userspace only - I will use this netchannel
> infra
