Hi,
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:31:16PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 12:58, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > - use "% 8" modulo instead of more complicated "% 5" calculation
>
> Why? There will be HZ=100 and HZ=250 boxes, 8ms doesn't fit well.
> 10ms is ok, 5ms or 2.5ms is more
On Friday 03 February 2006 12:58, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> this patch does:
> - implement much more flexible firmware statistics parsing
> (for /proc/driver/acx_wlanX_diag)
> This has the nice effect that we now get output for both the older
> TNETW1100 USB and TNETW1450.
> Since firmware stat
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:28:29PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2006 14:39, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Well, gcc obviously failed to realize that "% 16" == "& 15".
> > I'll file a bug.
>
> -ENOTABUG. It's incorrect for signed integers,
> and gcc uses idiv insn instead.
On Friday 03 February 2006 14:39, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> Well, gcc obviously failed to realize that "% 16" == "& 15".
> I'll file a bug.
-ENOTABUG. It's incorrect for signed integers,
and gcc uses idiv insn instead.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
On Friday 03 February 2006 12:58, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> - adev->tx_head = (head + 1) % TX_CNT;
> + /* slower: adev->tx_head = (head + 1) % TX_CNT; */
> + adev->tx_head = head + 1;
> + if (adev->tx_head >= TX_CNT)
> + adev->tx_head = 0;
struct a {
int tx_h
