09.07.2015 12:19, Thomas Petazzoni пишет:
> Sebastien, Stas,
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:03:26 +0200 (CEST), Sebastien Rannou wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>>
>>> What is there? A phy chip, or something else?
>>
>> It's "something else", there's a phy which aggregates 4xSGMIIs to
Sebastien, Stas,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:03:26 +0200 (CEST), Sebastien Rannou wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> > What is there? A phy chip, or something else?
>
> It's "something else", there's a phy which aggregates 4xSGMIIs to
> 1xQSGMII, we are on the media side here, the MA
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> What is there? A phy chip, or something else?
It's "something else", there's a phy which aggregates 4xSGMIIs to
1xQSGMII, we are on the media side here, the MAC side is connected
to the switch through QSGMII.
> Perhaps some DT property should be added to
08.07.2015 19:30, Sebastien Rannou пишет:
Hi Stas,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Stas Sergeev wrote:
When MDIO bus is unavailable (common setup for SGMII), the in-band
signaling must be used to correctly track link state.
This patch enables the in-band status delivery and interrupts for
links state cha
Hi Stas,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> When MDIO bus is unavailable (common setup for SGMII), the in-band
> signaling must be used to correctly track link state.
> This patch enables the in-band status delivery and interrupts for
> links state changes, namely:
> - link up/down
> - li
