On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:20:59 + "Daniel J Blueman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I'm still hitting this with e1000e on 2.6.25-rc2, 10 times again.
> are you sure? I don't think that's the ca
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:20:59 + "Daniel J Blueman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm still hitting this with e1000e on 2.6.25-rc2, 10 times again.
are you sure? I don't think that's the case and you're seeing e1000 dumps
here...
>> It's clearly non-fatal, but then
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:20:59 + "Daniel J Blueman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still hitting this with e1000e on 2.6.25-rc2, 10 times again.
>
> It's clearly non-fatal, but then do we expect it to occur?
>
> Daniel
>
> --- [dmesg]
>
> [ 1250.822786] swapper: page allocation failure. or