On 3/24/06, Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:02 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > That scp test shows 50%ish - but that was a quickie. The VNC
> > client even reported a 719Kbps throughput down from the more
> > usual 11500Kbps it starts off with. The first scp I tri
On 3/24/06, Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:02 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > That scp test shows 50%ish - but that was a quickie. The VNC
> > client even reported a 719Kbps throughput down from the more
> > usual 11500Kbps it starts off with. The first scp I tri
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:02 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> That scp test shows 50%ish - but that was a quickie. The VNC
> client even reported a 719Kbps throughput down from the more
> usual 11500Kbps it starts off with. The first scp I tried when the
> sluggishness was intolerable was going
On 3/23/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alessandro Suardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Plze try to cc the right people.
Sorry about that - should probably defer bug reporting to times
when I'm actually supposed to be awake (2:20am doesn't fit
the bill obviously :| )
>
"Alessandro Suardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Plze try to cc the right people.
> Driver - or firmware ? Don't know - since the new git snapshots run
> 1.1.1 which requires newer firmware from http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net.
>
> Symptom -> my new FC5 partition with 2.6.16-git kernels conn
